The Yale Law Journal



Note: Volume 127 of the Yale Law Journal is no longer accepting submissions. Volume 128 will begin reviewing submissions in February 2018.

To submit, please use our online submissions system. We highly encourage authors to submit their pieces to us exclusively for ten days.  Please see our General Submission Guidelines for details on our exclusive submissions process.



The Journal’s Style Sheet is available here.

The Journal’s Empirical Work Policy is available here.


The division between these two forms of professional scholarship serves not merely to separate longer pieces from shorter ones, but also to encourage two distinct and complementary approaches to legal analysis.

  • Articles devote substantial space to situating themselves within existing research, and they often frame their arguments as comprehensive analyses of a given subject.
  • Essays are often narrower in scope than Articles, but the subject matter is of general scholarly interest. Essays may experiment with style, tone, and voice. The ultimate goal of an Essay is to start a new and interesting scholarly conversation.

The Articles & Essays Committee reviews submissions without knowledge of the identity of the authors.

For data regarding when to submit Articles and Essays to YLJ, please click here.

For our policy on exploding offers, please click here.


YLJ Forum pieces are authored by professors, practitioners, and students, and they are generally shorter, timelier, and accessible to a general audience. Submissions are reviewed by the Forum & Features Committee without knowledge of the authors’ identities.

  • YLJ Forum Responses are scholarly reactions to our print and online content. The goal is for academics, practitioners, and students to use the YLJ Forum to engage with and challenge one another. YLJ Forum may feature multiple Responses to a given online or print piece. The Forum Committee additionally may solicit responses to print pieces and symposia commentaries. For a recent example, please see Cindy Cohn’s Response to The Fourth Amendment in the Information Age by Robert S. Litt.


Book Reviews are thoughtful commentaries by professors and practitioners on forthcoming or recently published books. They often use the book as a springboard for new lines of scholarly inquiry.

The current volume is at capacity for Book Reviews and is neither accepting nor soliciting proposals at this time. The next volume will begin reviewing Book Review proposals in 2018.


Notes are publications of substantial length authored by students at the Yale Law School, frequently with the assistance of the Journal’s Notes Development Editors. Successful Notes develop an innovative and well-supported thesis in a way that advances a particular legal field. The Notes & Comments Committee selects Notes through a blind review process, with Development Editors recused from voting on submissions from authors with whom they have worked.  


Comments are short pieces (about 3,500 words) authored by students at the Yale Law School, frequently with the assistance of the Journal's Comments Development Editors. Comments offer a novel idea about a discrete legal issue, often drawing on clinical or research experiences. While Comments are subject to the Journal’s normal standards for originality, they need not include an extensive literature review. The Notes & Comments Committee also chooses Comments through a blind review process, with appropriate recusals during voting.