Results for '5'
- SAW Survey Post-2000
positive or negative factor in your decision to purchase it? 1 2 3 4 5 B. Impact of the Local Historic District (LHD) 1. In terms of the City
Forum: Mission Accomplished?
section 5, this requirement rests on the presumption that changes to voting practices in regions with a history of discrimination in voting are
Forum: A Cure Worse than the Disease?
Parks, and Coretta Scott King Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 2006 (“VRARA”), Pub. L. No. 109-246, § 5, 120 Stat. 577, 580-81
- 18.Katz_Author_Approved
has since been modified. See 28 C.F.R. § 51.55(b) (2012) (“Preclearance under section 5 of a voting change will not preclude any legal action under
Forum: Mapping a Post-Shelby County Contingency Strategy
burdensome. . . .”); Crawford, 553 U.S. at 203 n.20. See Daniel Gonzalez, Latino Voters Surge in Arizona, Ariz. Republic (Nov. 5, 2012, 11:09 AM), http
- 1168.Fish
of “old age.” 540 U.S. at 592 n.5. It is not possible, however, to interpret “age” as meaning “youth.” While one of the alternative meanings of age
the Early Mail Fraud Statutes, 5 UTAH L. REV. 1079, 1124 n.165 (2021). 71. United States v. Baroni, 909 F.3d 550, 582 (3d Cir. 2018), rev’d sub nom
sections of 15 U.S.C., 18 U.S.C., 28 U.S.C., 29 U.S.C.); Yates v. United States, 574 U.S. 528 (2014). 5. Pub. L. No. 105-277, 112 Stat. 2681-856
- Weidenhammer_post_FLIP2
network.5 Moreover, where incompatibility exists among competing networks, free entry may not erode a dominant network’s market power.6 Hence
- PerryFINAL
82. Id. at 55-57. 83. On the proper interpretation of Hart on this point, see JOSEPH RAZ, THE AUTHORITY OF LAW 92-93 (1979). PERRYFINAL.DOC APRIL 5