The Yale Law Journal

Results for 'The core of the case against Judicial Review'

News: Judicial Review and Health Care Reform: Applying Jeremy Waldron's The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review

The Yale Law Journal - News: Judicial Review and Health Care Reform: Applying Jeremy Waldrons The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review Judicial

A Review

of Supreme Court decisions, most of them of recent vintage, and a few other judicial decisions here and abroad. He provides almost no context for the

Review

professionals, more than statute or case law, define the norms of corporate bankruptcy. This Book Review shows how rule-by-reorganizers can explain

Kapczynski Book Review

Questions of data and democracy, not just data and dignity, must be at the core of our concern. author. Professor of Law, Yale Law School. I thank

Forum: The “Bounds” of Moore: Pluralism and State Judicial Review

that when reviewing state laws governing federal elections, “state courts may not transgress the ordinary bounds of judicial review.” Justice Kavanaugh

Thapar-Masterman Book Review

constitutional provision. This Review explores what the original understanding of the judicial role can tell us about how to construe such provisions

Thapar-Masterman Book Review

constitutional provision. This Review explores what the original understanding of the judicial role can tell us about how to construe such provisions

Gilles & Friedman Book Review

”). examining the case for socialized law 2087 of this Review, as well) do not lightly indulge zero-sum assumptions, under which more for the poor

Forum: Original Understanding and the Whether, Why, and How of Judicial Review

case law reflects a boundary protection approach to judicial review. Courts in the founding era reviewed legislation that implicated the powers of

- 18. Kalman Book Review ME Proof 2_Final

Horwitz did not, 123 and their debate extends to Brown. For Fiss, Brown is law. Judicial review can only be justified by “an appreciation of the