U.S.C. § 25 (2018) (authorizing the government “to prevent and restrain” antitrust viola- tions). 237. For example, antitrust’s private equity provision

Cheng & Lee

leading to higher drug prices. This Essay proposes an option to discourage such transactions: an antitrust suit, which would not require the joinder of

The Antimonopoly Presidency

Technology and Competition Policy—that antitrust enforcers in previous administrations had “chosen the wrong path” by “following the misguided

- e.710.Khan.805

259 (1988); Eleanor M. Fox, The Moderniza- tion of Antitrust: A New Equilibrium, 66 CORNELL L. REV. 1140 (1981); Herbert Hovenkamp, Antitrust’s

antitrust evolved over time into separate strands of public law, the leaders of the antitrustmovement of the late nineteenth and early twentieth

- 17. Shelanski Feature Post ME Proof 1 clean

Antitrust’s Welfare Goals, 81 FORDHAM L. REV. 2471 (2013); Steven C. Salop, Question: What Is the Real and Proper Antitrust Welfare Standard? Answer

- 17. Woodcock ME Proof 1_Clean

useful to firms only as a tool for persuading consumers to purchase advertised prod- ucts. In the mid-twentieth century, courts applying the antitrust

- Salop Essay

‘Error Cost’ Analysis: What’s Wrong with Antitrust’s Right, 80 ANTITRUST L.J. 1, 1-2 (2015); Andrew I. Gavil & Steven C. Salop, Proba- bility

1483 E R I K H O V E N K A M P The Antitrust Duty to Deal in the Age of Big Tech abstract. The antitrust duty to deal is perhaps the most