- 3064.Kennedy.3075

497 (1954). The disputes resolved by Brown arose in states and were decided by application of the Fourteenth Amendment. The dispute resolved by

- AyresFINAL

on” of factors. But I came of age in an earlier time.18 Professors did not teach whether particular rules could be contracted around,19 and most

- SunsteinFINAL

emotions, but emphasizing arousal); and MARTHA C. NUSSBAUM, UPHEAVALS OF THOUGHT: THE INTELLIGENCE OF EMOTIONS (2001) (supporting a highly cognitive

fierce con- troversy,16 what is not controversial is that clinical-trial expenditures comprise the lion’s share of the costs, running around 70

this discussion has centered around the questions of constitu- tional interpretation raised by Haymond, and whether a revocation proceeding is part of a

Non-Reformist Reforms and Struggles over Life, Death, and Democracy

lows. For those of us who see the world around us on fire, the question is what is to be done. For the law professor, the lawyer, and even the law

- SaundersFINAL

controversial film was not “clearly established”); Bishop v. Aronov, 926 F.2d 1066, 1074-75 (11th Cir. 1991) (adopting the reasoning of Hazelwood “even at the

Does Pharma Need Patents?

of fierce controversy, what is not controversial is that clinical-trial expenditures comprise the lion’s share of the costs, running around 70

Why Motives Matter: Reframing the Crowding Out Effect of Legal Incentives

apart cases in which crowding out does or does not occur, but to build a normative framework around the cases where it does. The fact that it often