Results for '193'
The State’s Right to Property Under International Law
to property similarly constitutes a general principle of law: ninety-five percent of the 193 Member States of the United Nations guarantee a general
Forum: Bounds in Bank Regulation
UCLA L. Rev. 1262 (2013); Steven L. Schwarcz, Systemic Risk, 97 Geo. L. J. 193, 206 (2008). See, e.g., Dan Awrey, Regulating Financial Innovation: A
State Water Ownership and the Future of Groundwater Management
the scope of the owned-property exclusion, see Norfolk S. Corp. v. Cal. Union Ins. Co., 859 So. 2d 167, 193 (La. Ct. App. 2003), writ denied, 861 So
Forum: The “Bounds” of Moore: Pluralism and State Judicial Review
Allen, Alabama produced a new map that, once again, containe… See Marks v. United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 (1977) (“When a fragmented Court decides a
Forum: Snyder v. Phelps, the Supreme Court’s Speech-Tort Jurisprudence, and Normative Considerations
Tort Jurisprudence, and Normative Considerations, 120 Yale L.J. Online 193 (2010), ...
Forum: Escape from the “Devonian Amber”: A Reply to Voting and Vice
women.” Nancy Isenberg, Sex and Citizenship in Antebellum America 193 (1998). See Charles W. Calhoun, Conceiving a New Republic: The Republican Party
Forum: Secrecy, Intimacy, and Workable Rules: Justice Sotomayor Stakes Out the Middle Ground in United States v. Jones
Rev. 193 (1890). For discussions of Warren and Brandeis’s piece and how it influenced the Court, see Rubenfeld, supra note 2, at 115-18. For a
Forum: Predatory Pricing: Limiting Brooke Groupe to Monopolies and Sound Implementation of Price-Cost Comparison
II-2969 ¶¶ 173-193 (Ct. First Instance), aff’d on other grounds, C-497/99 P, 2001 E.C.R. I-5333 (E.C.J.). On the other hand, the European Commission
Forum: “Safety, in a Republican Sense”:Trump v. United States, Democracy, and an Antisubordination Theory of the Criminal Law
Influence of European Writers on Late Eighteenth-Century American Political Thought, 78 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 189, 193 (1984). Charles de Secondat Montesquieu
Forum: Equal Supreme Court Access for Military Personnel: An Overdue Reform
discussing motions for summary disposition in the circuit courts). Indeed, CAAF could “collapse the petition and plenary stages” of its review without legislation. See Fidell & ...