- 17. Salop Feature Post ME Proof 1 clean

State of Antitrust Enforcement, A.B.A. SEC. ANTITRUST L. 7-8 (Jan. 2017), http://www.americanbar.org/content /dam/aba/publications/antitrust_law

- r.1072.Dameron.1114

antitrust’s creation 1095 century.127 These same historical accounts sometimes suggest that the populists pushing the development of state antitrust

administrations”). antitrust’s high-tech exceptionalism 591 The conventional wisdom for why antitrust was unable to prevent the growth of these

Vaheesan

980 THE YALE LAW JOURNAL FORUM J U N E 4 , 2 0 1 8 The Twilight of the Technocrats’ Monopoly on Antitrust? Sandeep Vaheesan

- Wright & Mungan Essay

Easterbrook’s seminal 1984 article, The Limits of An- titrust, theorizes that Type I error costs are greater than Type II error costs in the antitrust

Khan

Reconsidering Antitrust’s Goals, 53 B.C. L. REV. 551 (2012); Lina Khan & Sandeep Vaheesan, Market Power and Inequality: The Antitrust

Recovering the Moral Economy Foundations of the Sherman Act

the inextricable connection between antitrust’s institutional structure and its normative goals); Justin (Gus) Hurwitz, Administrative Antitrust, 21 Geo

judicial construction of antitrust law. This inter- pretation follows once we recognize antitrust’s core function of allocating coor- dination rights, and

antitrust tools in the copyright context that should be addressed. Antitrust’s market-definition analysis assumes that the rel- evant products or