Results for 'license'
Forum: Breaking with Custom
international law into a “roving license” to create international criminal law, thereby threatening the separation of powers and the Constitution. Well
Forum: Intellectual Property as Property
downstream products need only focus on her contribution and the claims of others (supplemented by whatever contractual license terms are considered
Forum: The Case for Creative Pluralism in Adoption and Foster Care
rights as a “license to discriminate” is no more legitimate than the old slandering of LGBTQ freedoms as a license to engage in perversion. The
Forum: Charles Reich’s Unruly Administrative State
838 So. 2d 5, 21-22 (La. Ct. App. 2002) (Gonzales, J., concurring) (citing Reich for the claim that “a license, once issued, albeit a privilege cannot
The First Patent Litigation Explosion
subsequent campaign to enforce the patent. Agents spread across the countryside, seeking license fees of between $10 and $50 per mill (equivalent to
Forum: The Due Process Right To Pursue a Lawful Occupation: A Brighter Future Ahead?
occupational regulations. Patel invalidated a law that required individuals who make their living by threading eyebrows to obtain a cosmetology license, which
Forum: Dereliction of Duty: State-Bar Inaction in Response to America’s Access-to-Justice Crisis
the breadth of the ban on others participating in legal service, the arduous and expensive prerequisites to acquire a license, and the prescriptive
Intellectual Property
Because liability is difficult to predict and the consequences of infringement are dire, risk-averse intellectual property users often seek a license
Forum: Why the IRS Has Not Taxed Income from Virtual World Transactions . . . Yet
described as a non-exclusive license to use his new shield rather than a property right. Without a property right, he has not realized any income
Forum: Uniformity and Integrity in Immigration Law: Lessons from the Decisions of Justice (and Judge) Sotomayor
plain meaning approach to the word “license,” the Court held that Arizona’s law was not preempted, but rather fell “well within the confines of the