The Yale Law Journal

Results for '68'

Disability and the Ongoing Federalism Revolution

Fourteenth Amendment in Brown v. Board of Education. See John P. MacKenzie, Confirmation of Rehnquist Voted, 68-26, Wash. Post, Dec. 11, 1971, at A1. 5

In Loco Reipublicae

68 (1982) (… Enforcement of parental duties in this context does not include giving children the right to sue t… See Uneducated: Substantial

The History Wars and Property Law: Conquest and Slavery as Foundational to the Field

Constitutional Law, 68 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 1087, 1087 (1993); Maggie Blackhawk, Federal Indian Law as Paradigm Within Public Law, 132 Harv. L. Rev. 1787, 1793-95

Williams-Yulee and the Anomaly of Campaign Finance Law

Law’s Path in the Roberts Court’s First Decade: A Sharp Right Turn but with Speed Bumps and Surprising Twists, 68 Stan. L. Rev. 1597, 1603-04 (2016

Forum: Concerted Arbitration

supra note 7; Alison Frankel, Uber Tells Its Side of the Story in Mass… See United States Arbitration Act, Pub. L. No. 68-401, 43 Stat. 883 (1925). In

Leviathan and Interpretive Revolution: The Administrative State, the Judiciary, and the Rise of Legislative History, 1890-1950

Commission Respondent at 68-70, Corn Prods. Ref. Co. v. FTC, 324 U.S. 726 (1945) (No. 680). For other arguments in this vein, see Brief for the United States

Forum: The (Not So) New Law of the Child

Rethinking Free Exercise of Religion After Smith and Boerne: Charting A Middle Course, 68 Miss. L.J. 105 (1998) (describing Prince as “wrongly upholding” the

Forum: Pedagogy of Prefiguration

Radicals? An Abolitionist Framework, 68 UCLA … See David Singh Grewal & Jedediah Purdy, Introduction: Law and Neoliberalism, 77 Law & Contemp. Pr… Cf

A Tribute to Justice Antonin Scalia

in part) (calling for the Court to overrule Auer); Talk Am., Inc. v. Mich. Bell Tel. Co., 564 U.S. 50, 67-68 (2011) (Scalia, J., concurring) (doubting

Forum: Lower Court Popular Constitutionalism

refusing to apply strict or heightened scrutiny). See, e.g., Equal. Found. of Greater Cincinnati, Inc. v. City of Cincinnati, 54 F.3d 261, 266-68 (6th Cir