Results for 'TH'
Forum: The National Security Constitution and the Bush Administration
cuts across the theories offered by Eskridge and Ferejohn and those offered by Ackerman. These theories are similar in that they posit a process
Forum: Online Legal Scholarship: The Medium and the Message
also glom onto them—they depend on them rather than displace them. This is the second of the two effects of online media I mentioned earlier. The old
Forum: The Legal Profession, Personal Responsibility, and the Internet
Internet Our law students are more tech-savvy than ever. Unfortunately, they occasionally lack sense. Some of them simply fail to realize that we
Forum: IP Essentialism and the Authority of the Firm
thus seem justified when they echo concerns about fairness and justice (similar to those that mark A2K activities) and effectively frame the central
The Sentence Imposed Versus the Statutory Maximum: Repairing the Armed Career Criminal Act
Yale Law Journal - The Sentence Imposed Versus the Statutory Maximum: Repairing the Armed Career Criminal Act The Sentence Imposed Versus the Statutory Maximum: Repairing the ...
The Responsibility To Protect: The U.N. World Summit and the Question of Unilateralism
Yale Law Journal - The Responsibility To Protect: The U.N. World Summit and the Question of Unilateralism
The Law-of-Nations Origins of the Marshall Trilogy
provides a definition of the law of nations (le droit des gens). 1 E. de Vattel, Th… See 1 Vattel, The Law of Nations, supra note 10, at 17 (contrasting
News: From the Archives: The Legality of Homosexual Marriage
piece presciently touches on several of the legal arguments upon which the Court ultimately relied in Obergefell. We believe that this YLJ Note is among
The Moral Ambiguity of Public Prosecution
than that of most if not all third parties. By inverting these structures of accountability, the state that acts as exclusive public prosecutor
The Fourth Amendment and General Law
answers those questions, and in so doing lays forth a new, comprehensive theory of the Fourth Amendment. We argue that courts should interpret the