- SiegelPostFINAL

U.S. 641 (1966). 4. United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598, 616 n.7 (2000). 5. 521 U.S. 507 (1997). 6. For some subsequent cases, see Bd. of Trs

supra note 234; Savage, supra note 238. 441. 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(1)(A) (2018). 442. See, e.g., CNN, Inc. v. FBI, 384 F. Supp. 3d 19, 38 (D.D.C. 2019

- h.2470.Deutsch.2514

act further defines to “participate” 56. See, e.g., 745 ILL. COMP. STAT. 70/5 (1998) (Illinois); MICH. COMP. LAWS ANN. § 333.20181 (West 2013

- Feldman_2-26-07_pre-contact

Greenberg ed., 2006). 4. MARTHA C. NUSSBAUM, FRONTIERS OF JUSTICE: DISABILITY, NATIONALITY, SPECIES MEMBERSHIP (2006). 5. KWAME ANTHONY APPIAH

PRITCHARD, SECURITIES REGULATION: CASES AND ANALYSIS chs. 5, 6 (5th ed. 2019) (separately discussing “Rule 10b-5 Antifraud” and “Insider Trading”); JOHN C

- 954

Contractors of Am. v. City of Jacksonville, 508 U.S. 656, 661-62 (1993) (citing City of Mesquite). 59. 551 U.S. 701, 719 (2007). section 5

Title 18 Insider Trading

Choi & A.C. Pritchard, Securities Regulation: Cases and Analysis chs. 5, 6 (5th ed.… Judge Rakoff has maintained that embezzlement is, or should be

- BebchukFINAL

42. See Bebchuk & Cohen, supra note 8, tbl.5. 43. See id. tbl.6. BEBCHUKFINAL 11/21/2002 12:34 PM 570 The Yale Law Journal [Vol. 112: 553 TABLE

- 1182.Young.1230

Top-200.” Virtually all of the Vault Top-100 are contained in this sample. Id. at 19 n.5. 56. Id. at 4. 57. See, e.g., Timothy L. O’Brien, Up