Ownership,” READCUBE 2-3 (2018) [hereinafter AST Appendix], https://www.readcube.com /articles/supplement?doi=10.1111%2Fjofi.12698 [https://perma.cc

- 17. Hovenkamp & Shapiro ME Proof 1_clean

§ 3(2). the yale law journal 127:1996 2018 2022 by both the case law 120 and the 2010 Merger Guidelines. 121 But the language may help clarify

- 2428.King.2458_updated

postconviction review 2438 A. State Postconviction Review Before Martinez 2438 1. Filing Rates 2439 2. Counsel and Hearings 2442 3. Relief 2446 B. State

- e.484.Hill.532

tendency of markets” can corrupt things on which we place nonmonetary value.25 Meanwhile, others argue that 20. See Tidmarsh, supra note 2, at 237 n.39

23. ME. CONST. art. VIII, pt. 1, § 1; ME. REV. STAT. ANN. tit. 20-A, § 2(1) (1991). 24. See ME. REV. STAT. ANN. tit. 20-A, § 5204(4) (2007). 25

a) (2012); see 12 C.F.R. § 226.17(a)(2) (2016). 267. See 12 C.F.R. § 226.17(a)(1). 268. See id. 269. Brown v. Payday Check Advance, Inc., 202 F.3d

A Better Balance: Providing Survivors of Sexual Violence with “Effective Protection” Against Sex Discrimination Through Title IX Complaints

Officer for Fed. Student Aid, U.S. Dep’t of Educ., to Barbara Boxer, U.S. Senator 2 (Apr. 28, 2015), http://www.boxer.senate.gov/press/related

STAT. ANN. § 2C:51-2 (West 2019); State v. Hupka, 1 A.3d 640, 645-46 (N.J. 2010). 74. HICKMAN, supra note 52, at 2. These figures do not cover New York

Grunwald & Rappaport Article

disqualification from holding any public office. See N.J. STAT. ANN. § 2C:51-2 (West 2019); State v. Hupka, 1 A.3d 640, 645-46 (N.J. 2010). 74