Results for '2'
Grunwald & Rappaport Article
disqualification from holding any public office. See N.J. STAT. ANN. § 2C:51-2 (West 2019); State v. Hupka, 1 A.3d 640, 645-46 (N.J. 2010). 74
Pregnancy, Poverty, and the State
2017, 2:52 PM), http://thinkprogress.org/title-x-funding-c0b54e2d9a2b http://perma.cc/MD7A-7L7P; see also Napili, supra note 21, at 5 (“The House
Forum: The Social Meaning of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
and Jobs Act § 11022(a) § (amending I.R.C. § 24 (h)(2) (2012) by increasing the credit amount from $1,000 to $2,000). See id. (adding the new phaseout
- k.2132.Peterson-Ortiz.2155 final
for Fed. Student Aid, U.S. Dep’t of Educ., to Barbara Boxer, U.S. Senator 2 (Apr. 28, 2015), http://www.boxer.senate.gov/press /related
Forum: The Rise of Bank Prosecutions
2014). Plea agreement at 1-2, U.S. v. BNP Paribas S.A., June 27, 2015, at http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/opa/legacy/2014/06/30/plea
Diffusing Disputes: The Public in the Private of Arbitration, the Private in Courts, and the Erasure of Rights
abstract=2516432 http://perma.ccs/LPM3-8KPG. AT&T Wireless Customer Agreement, supra note 2, at § 1.3. Id. at §§ 2.1-2.2; see also CFPB 2015 Arbitration
Forum: When Religion and the Public-Education Mission Collide
Ctr. 2 (2021), https://edlawcenter.org/assets/$600%20Billion/$600%20Billion%20Lost.pdf https://perma.cc/JA5L-C7VB (“In the decade following the Great
- d.2804.Resnik.2939
240. AAA Ethical Principles, supra note 28. 241. See, e.g., Consumer Due Process Protocol, supra note 232, Principle 12(2); JAMS Comprehensive
Legitimacy and Federal Criminal Enforcement Power
Maximize? An Analysis of the Federalization of Drug Crimes, 2 Am. L. & Econ. Rev. 259, 273 (2000) (noting that, compared to drug defendants in state courts
- 812.Mahaffy.860
optimal funding levels under these different regimes, see Hemel & Ouellette, supra note 4 (manuscript at 23-25). 25. See supra notes 1-2. 26. The