Results for 'evidence'
Perceptions of Taxing and Spending: A Survey Experiment
efforts to publicize and rein in the costs of tax expenditures. Our Note helps to explain this apparent paradox. We offer evidence on how the
Forum: Reading the ACA’s Findings: Textualism, Severability and the ACA’s Return to the Court
provision unless there is strong evidence that Congress intended otherwise. To use an analogy employed most recently by both Chief Justice Roberts and
Forum: The Costs of Consensus in Statutory Construction
thanks to Abbe Gluck’s authoritative article, Laboratories of Statutory Interpretation, proponents of interpretive uniformity have evidence that some
Barbarians Inside the Gates: Raiders, Activists, and the Risk of Mistargeting
agent costs in light of our model and the available empirical evidence; it concludes that activists are likely to impose greater costs than raiders
Inside the Agency Class Action
more experienced counsel, hear complex statistical evidence involving company-wide practices, and sometimes certify sub-classes to ensure parties with
Forum: How Whren Protects Pretext
The evidence adduced in a motion to suppress the fruits of searches and seizures consists, nearly always, of nothing more than the testimony of
Election Law
census historically is inaccurate and biased—and 2020 Census data may be even more so—courts should clarify that they will consider evidence that
Forum: The Justice as Commissioner: Benching the Judge-Umpire Analogy
on evidence: “the judge must cease to be merely an umpire at the game of litigation.” Indeed, Wigmore, like the Crittenden and Hazen courts, explicitly
Forum: Justice Sotomayor and the Supreme Court’s Certiorari Process
has issued statements provides further evidence of her deep certiorari-stage engagement. All but one of the cases came from the in forma pauperis
Returning to Common-Law Principles of Insider Trading After United States v. Newman
information from the insiders to the defendant tippees moots the former error—at least on the evidence accepted in the Second Circuit—and justifies the