Thapar-Masterman Book Review

democratic or libertarian document. 105 And that question is arguably not strictly historical. But if the rat- ifying public expected that the exercise

Srinivasan Feature

of sex”: either because it was a harm that could (in principle, if rarely in practice) be equally perpetrated against male 16. Catharine MacKinnon

”: either because it was a harm that could (in principle, if rarely in practice) be equally perpetrated against male 16. Catharine MacKinnon says that the

- Coenen_Press_v2web

the Constitution itself, because signatures on a cover letter, especially if accompanied by the right wording, were less likely to translate into an

reports on racism—what we call “antiracist expert evi- dence.” This finding would be unremarkable if such experts were unhelpful, but nearly ninety percent

Hart Ely, laws infringing these rights should be invalidated if they burden only some in society while leaving the rights of the enacting majority

Mooney Comment

“Even if the police pulled over the world’s greatest legal expert, the citizen still couldn’t know what orders are lawful because the laws often hinge

inconvenience cannot prevail when balanced against legitimate concerns for the officer’s safety.”). 16. See Kerr, supra note 14 (“Even if the police

Court often makes these determinations in cases in which the equality compo- nent is hidden. If this practice continues, it is possible the Court could