tious, criminal, or otherwise a violation of some legal duty” under positive law if 1. 389 U.S. 347 (1967); see, e.g., Kiel Brennan-Marquez

Forum: Chosen Family, Care, and the Workplace

families. However, such flexibility can pose administrative challenges. The laws will only achieve their purpose if both the public and private personnel

focusing exclusively on “single axes” of discrimination tends to illuminate only the most privileged subgroups with- in a given subordinated class.16 If

shareholders in each class vote to approve or reject the proposed plan.3 If every class of creditors and shareholders votes in favor of the proposed plan, and

in each class vote to approve or reject the proposed plan.3 If every class of creditors and shareholders votes in favor of the proposed plan, and

approve or reject the proposed plan.3 If every class of creditors and shareholders votes in favor of the proposed plan, and it satisfies a number of

- Daskal

requirements that ap- ply if and when the government directly—and remotely—accesses a computer or data known to be located across borders.9 Each of these

- Daskal

requirements that ap- ply if and when the government directly—and remotely—accesses a computer or data known to be located across borders.9 Each of these

- Daskal

requirements that ap- ply if and when the government directly—and remotely—accesses a computer or data known to be located across borders.9 Each of these