- Re_4-29-07_pre-contact

systematic jury 151. Id. at 63. 152. Id. at 56-57. 153. Id. at 59-61. 154. Id. at 60 (emphasis added). RE_4-29-07_PRE-CONTACT 5/17/2007 9

- Nagaraj_4-29-07_pre-contact

NAGARAJ_4-29-07_PRE-CONTACT 5/17/2007 9:42:37 AM 1615 comment The Marriage of Family Law and Private Judging in California As court

- KatyalFINAL

conspiracy, Sham’st thou to show thy dang’rous brow by night, When evils are most free?”). 5. WAYNE R. LAFAVE, CRIMINAL LAW 573 & n.66 (3d ed. 2000) (stating

- Sitkoff & Schanzenbach Final

trust against which the settlor’s creditors 72. Portions of this section draw on DUKEMINIER ET AL., supra note 5, at 557-60, 566-69. 73. See

- 0642.Blair-Stanek.0679

or crucial factor”). 5. See Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Mfg. Co., 243 U.S. 502, 510 (1917); In re Papesch, 315 F.2d 381, 391

- Eichensehr_5-10-07_pre-contact

Preemptive Self-Defense, 97 AM. J. INT’L L. 599 (2003). EICHENSEHR_05-01-07_FORMATTEDFORSC 5/30/2007 11:38:00 PM the yale law journal 116:1873 2007

SPSS_LHD_Data_Excel_Format_26c81e1f.xls

1 1 3 2 2 2 . . 2 1910 $52,780 . $27,860 $80,640 $27.72 $40,320.00 1996 $57,500 0.11 1904 148 1 1 1 1 . . 4 4 4 1 1 5 5 . 3 2 4 4 4 . . . 1 2 2 1

a Virginia hedge fund with $10 billion in assets, according to corporate records.”). 51. See Fan et al., supra note 15, at 5. 52. See supra note

Capital, a Virginia hedge fund with $10 billion in assets, according to corporate records.”). 51. See Fan et al., supra note 15, at 5. 52. See