Results for '2'
- 21.Tuerkheimer_AuthorApproved_v1
journal online 123:335 2013 336 it claims to repudiate,”2 a satisfactory justification must succeed those discarded. On this—the need for a “new
- Williams_2-26-07_pre-contact
postponed to May 20, 2006. See La. Exec. Order No. KBB 2006-2 (Jan. 24, 2006), http://www.legis.state.la.us/katrina/eoorders/06-02.pdf. 74. Cf. id. at 1
- Fennell_4-29-07_pre-contact
Cell A requires the 172. Cf. Levmore, supra note 72, at 2154 & n.14 (observing that C&M’s Rule 2 can be partitioned into Rule 2N, in which
- Jaffee_3-26-07_post-OP
19, with 2 SANBORN 1924, supra note 24, No. 233. 72. See Deed of Oct. 27, 1915 (recorded Oct. 30, 1915), in 762 NHLR, supra note 1, at 476. 73
- Flanders_2-26-07_pre-contact
States, 366 U.S. 213, 216-17 (1961). 38. 121 U.S. 1 (1887). 39. 462 U.S. 579, 582 n.2 (1983). 40. 272 U.S. 542 (1926). Salinger’s language
- Re_4-29-07_pre-contact
F. Supp. 2d at 70-71 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1863(b)(2) (2000)). RE_4-29-07_PRE-CONTACT 5/17/2007 9:36:22 AM re-justifying the fair cross section
- Feldman_2-26-07_pre-contact
with 1. See, e.g., Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 126 S. Ct. 2749 (2006); Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004); Rasul v. Bush, 542 U.S. 466 (2004). 2
- Stack_2-26-07_pre-contact
construing 26 U.S.C. § 9704(b)(2)(A)(i) (2000)). 237. See id. at 812; Nat’l Coal Ass’n v. Chater, 81 F.3d 1077, 1081-82 (11th Cir. 1996). 238. See
- Nagaraj_4-29-07_pre-contact
documents/ar2005.pdf. 2. See In re Marriage of Assemi, 872 P.2d 1190, 1197 (Cal. 1994) (“Once a temporary judge has taken an oath of office, he or she
- Strahilevitz_4-29-07_pre-contact
REV. 2, ¶ 54. 54. See BENKLER, supra note 3, at 70-74, 76-80. 55. See id. at 63-90, 216-25, 337-44. These examples are less clearly characterized