Results for '18'
- FleisigGreeneFINAL
Concerning Contempts of Court, ch. 99, 4 Stat. 487 (1831) (current version at 18 U.S.C. § 401). 105. See supra note 23. For more on the case, the
- g.2189.Boeglin-Taranto.2201
20 15 2192 B. Stare Decisis and the FISA Courts In terms of its core function, the FISC is effectively a federal district court.18 The vast
- c.1304.Sommers.1362 final
local police to be required to wear cameras have seen fit to name their proposal the “Mike Brown Law.”18 It was perhaps natural for the White House
bias in the Justice Department and discredit Robert Mueller’s investigation of Russian interference.18 In each case, Presidents used their
Refining Constitutional Torts
18 How.) 331, 336 (1856); Jefferson Branch Bank v. Skelly, 66 U.S. (1 Black) 436, 443-44 (1862); Osborn v. Bank of the United States, 22 U.S. (9
Forum: The Effort to Reform the Federal Criminal Justice System
maximums for certain drug offenses committed by those with prior drug convictions, fixing the onerous stacking of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) charges on those who
- SchwartzFINAL
length in Treanor, supra note 240. 249. See, e.g., Cooper v. Telfair, 4 U.S. (4 Dall.) 14, 18 (1800) (Washington, J.) (“The presumption . . . must
Price Note
pleading for the U.S. De- partment of Justice (DOJ) to prosecute Signal and grant the men asylum in America. 17 But DOJ refused. 18 No criminal
Forum: How to Get the Property Out of Privacy Law
Video Voyeurism Prevention Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1801 (2018). See, e.g., Maddy Varner & Aaron Sankin, Suckers List: How Allstate’s Secret Auto Insurance
the Court’s Concerns and Interventions 18 ii. study methodology 19 iii. findings 25 A. Cases in Which Qualified Immunity Cannot Play a Role 27 B