Results for 'IF'
Forum: The Abortion Interoperability Trap
travels to a Connecticut medical practice for abortion services. Under current state law, if the Connecticut practice shares records of the patient’s
Reducing Inequality on the Cheap: When Legal Rule Design Should Incorporate Equity as Well as Efficiency
tax on capital discourages investment. I will call this empirical result the “one-third rule.” If the distortion from departing from the “efficient
Equal Protection in the Key of Respect
Journal, especially Ben Eidelson, Adam Adler, and Miriam Hinman, as well as Professor Bruce Ackerman for thoughtful comments on this piece. Introduction If
Forum: Supreme Court as Superweapon: A Response to Epps & Sitaraman
legitimacy in order to save it. And their case that there is any crisis may fail to persuade a reader with different legal or political priors. If the
How To Trim a Christmas Tree: Beyond Severability and Inseverability for Omnibus Statutes
if the remainder is not “fully operative as a law”; and the hypothetical-passage principle, that courts should strike the remainder down unless
Forum: Courts in the Age of Dysfunction
said that there is a “special providence for drunkards, fools, and the United States of America.” If so, the Holy One has fallen down on the job lately
Forum: Climate Justice and the Elusive Climate Tort
injunction. Even if a regulatory regime could achieve emissions reductions objectives more effectively than tort law, however, CJ claimants have lost the
Forum: Group Harms in Antiterrorism Efforts: A Pervasive Problem with No Simple Solution
The fact that nearly all of the Muslims investigated are innocent would not reduce the stigma if their having been investigated remains more salient
Fitting the MPC into a Reasons-Responsiveness Conception of Subjective Culpability
one another. If the reasons-responsiveness picture of culpability is correct, we should expect frequent cases of interhierarchical disagreement between
Forum: Religious Liberty for Politically Active Minority Groups: A Response to NeJaime and Siegel
They say that defenders of traditional sexual morality, who used to be a political majority, now argue for their individual rights as if they were a