The Yale Law Journal

Results for '9'

- 9.Vladeck.D3_Ready_for_HTML_v2

already be five votes to take such a potentially momentous—and troubling—step. Consider Ex parte Young.9 Although scholars continue to debate the

- 9.Sharkey.D3_Ready_for_HTML_v2

authoritative judicial determination of the merits of their legal claim” in actions against CMS under the APA.9 Furthermore, the majority suggested

Masthead: Volume 9

The Yale Law Journal - Masthead: Volume 9

- 9.Macfarlane Macroed Final

United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 907 (1998)). 9. United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 907 (1984) (“An objectionable collateral conse- quence of [the

- 9. Fletcher Macro for PDF

’ worth of business on Indian lands. Indian energy revenue disbursements from the 1. Compare The Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16 (2012

Masthead: Volume 91

The Yale Law Journal - Masthead: Volume 91

Masthead: Volume 90

The Yale Law Journal - Masthead: Volume 90

- 912

9647, Inter-Am. Comm’n H.R., Report No. 3/87, OEA/Ser.L./V/II.71, doc. 9 rev. 1 ¶ 54 (1987). 161. INT’L LAW ASS’N, supra note 5, § 15, at 27. The

- 868.Bellia.900

perspectives, however, the case for 8. Id. at 916. 9. See id. at 930 (noting the benefits of experimentation). BELLIA PREOP 4/6/2009 2:55:15 PM

- 940.Stephenson.979_updated

Harkin, Fixing the Filibuster: Restoring Real Democracy in the Senate, 95 IOWA L. REV. BULL. 67, 74 (2010); Arney, supra note 9, at 276. 23. For